The Proper Love of Self

The words as yourself are significant. They assume that there is a proper love of self.

Christianity places self-giving love at the heart of the moral life. Christ tells us that whoever wishes to follow him must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow; he teaches that the greatest love is to lay down one’s life for one’s friends, and his own life reaches its culmination in the complete gift of himself on the Cross. For this reason Christian spirituality has always emphasized sacrifice, service, and self-denial, since we cannot become holy while remaining enclosed within ourselves. Love necessarily moves us outward, asking us to overcome selfishness, to set aside our preferences when necessary, and to make a sincere gift of ourselves to God and to others.

Yet this teaching can be misunderstood, because self-denial does not mean self-contempt, and self-sacrifice does not require the destruction of the self. Nor does Christian charity demand that we neglect our legitimate physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs until we can no longer fulfill the responsibilities God has entrusted to us. Christ’s own commandment supplies the balance: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Those two words, as yourself, assume that there is a proper love of self, so that the problem is not self-love as such but disordered self-love—the tendency to make ourselves the center of reality, to prefer our own comfort or advantage unjustly, or to subordinate the good of others to our desires. Proper self-love is something quite different. It means recognizing our dignity as persons created in the image of God, accepting ourselves truthfully, and caring responsibly for the life and gifts God has entrusted to us. We belong ultimately to God, and our body, mind, talents, time, and health are not possessions to use carelessly but gifts to be received gratefully, developed responsibly, and placed at the service of love. This gives Christian self-love a very different foundation from narcissism or self-absorption, for we do not love ourselves because we imagine ourselves superior to others; we love ourselves because God loves us. Our worth does not depend on achievement, popularity, appearance, usefulness, or the approval of other people; it rests first in the fact that God created us, redeemed us, and calls us to eternal communion with him. To reject ourselves fundamentally would therefore mean rejecting something God himself has created and loves, and humility does not require this. Humility is truth, and it allows us to recognize both our gifts and our limitations without exaggerating either: we acknowledge our sins and defects, and we also acknowledge our dignity, knowing that we are creatures dependent on God and also children called to share his life. A healthy Christian spirituality holds these truths together.

The danger arises when self-denial is read as though the self itself were the enemy, but Christ does not ask us to destroy the person he came to redeem. What must die is the “old self”—selfishness, pride, disordered attachment, everything that keeps us from loving freely—while the true self is not annihilated by grace but purified and brought to fulfillment. This distinction is essential for understanding sacrifice, since every genuine sacrifice involves giving up some good for the sake of a greater good, as when a parent gives up sleep to care for a sick child or a friend gives up convenience to help someone in difficulty. Such sacrifices are meaningful precisely because what is given has value: if our time had no value, giving it would not be generous, and if our life had no value, laying it down would not be a sacrifice. Christian self-gift therefore presupposes the worth of the person who gives, which is why proper self-love and self-sacrifice are not opposites but partners—proper self-love is what makes authentic self-gift possible. A person who understands his dignity can give himself freely, whereas a person who believes he has no value may surrender himself for very different reasons: fear of rejection, an inability to set boundaries, a compulsive need for approval, or the conviction that his own legitimate needs simply do not matter. Outwardly both may look generous, while inwardly the one gives from freedom and the other may be acting from fear.

This matters because excessive self-sacrifice can masquerade as virtue. A person may continually put everyone else first, never say no, accept unreasonable demands, and feel responsible for solving every problem around him, and others may praise his generosity, yet over time he grows exhausted, resentful, or emotionally depleted, neglecting sleep, health, prayer, or the duties that objectively have greater priority, until at last he can serve no one well. This is not necessarily charity, because generosity must be governed by prudence. The Christian moral life is not simply a matter of doing as much as possible for as many people as possible; it is a matter of loving according to the right order, since we have responsibilities toward God, ourselves, our family, our work, and the wider community, and these obligations are not interchangeable. A parent cannot indefinitely neglect his children because other people keep asking for help, a person cannot ruin his health through needless overwork and call the result sacrifice, and someone responsible for a community cannot pour so much attention into one needy individual that he neglects everyone else in his care. Charity requires discernment, so that sometimes love says yes and sometimes love must say no.

The inability to say no is not automatically a sign of holiness; it may come from fear of disappointing others. Some people feel intense guilt whenever they refuse a request, even when the request is unreasonable or conflicts with a more serious responsibility, because they have learned to draw their sense of worth from being needed, so that helping becomes not only an act of charity but a way of securing approval. This can create unhealthy relationships, since the person who continually rescues others may unintentionally encourage irresponsibility, and someone who never lets another face the consequences of his choices may hinder his growth rather than help it. Love seeks the true good of the other person, and that good is not always identical with what the person wants from us. A friend may ask us to support a destructive decision, a family member may keep demanding assistance while refusing reasonable responsibility, or a colleague may expect exceptions that would be unjust to others, and in such cases saying no may be the more loving response. Christ himself did not satisfy every request made of him: he withdrew from the crowds to pray, he did not heal every sick person in Palestine, and he refused to let other people’s expectations determine his mission, so that his life was complete self-gift yet never directionless availability, because he acted according to the will of the Father. This is the model of Christian service. We should be generous, but our generosity must be ordered by vocation, duty, and prudence, and the proper love of self helps us keep that order by reminding us that our own person is also entrusted to our care.

St. Paul tells us that our body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, which gives even bodily care a spiritual dimension, so that sleep, nutrition, exercise, medical care, and reasonable recreation are not necessarily selfish concerns but ordinary aspects of stewardship. These goods can of course become disordered—we can grow excessively preoccupied with health, appearance, or comfort—but abuse does not eliminate proper use, and a Christian should neither worship the body nor neglect it. The same holds for our emotional and psychological health, since we are not pure spirits: fatigue affects our patience, stress affects our judgment, isolation affects our stability, and unresolved wounds influence our relationships and decisions. Recognizing this is realism, not weakness. Sometimes a person needs rest, sometimes he needs to speak with a trusted friend, sometimes he needs spiritual direction, and sometimes professional counselling or psychological treatment is appropriate; seeking such help is not a failure of faith, because grace ordinarily works through human means, and proper self-love lets us use those means without shame. It also helps us accept our limits. Every human being is limited in time, energy, and competence, so that we cannot solve every problem, be available to everyone, or fulfill every expectation, and this can be hard for conscientious people who feel that if some good could be done, they are somehow obliged to do it. But the existence of a good possibility does not automatically create a personal duty, for there are always more good things that could be done than any one person can accomplish, and it is vocation that gives order to generosity. God does not ask us to do everything; he asks us to do faithfully what belongs to us, and this truth brings freedom. We can help others generously without imagining ourselves indispensable, rest without believing the world depends on our constant activity, allow another person to take responsibility, and remember that God is the Savior and we are not.

Excessive self-sacrifice can in fact hide a subtle pride, since we may imagine that everything depends on us, find it hard to delegate, intervene where we are not needed, and feel guilty whenever others struggle, as though we should have prevented every difficulty. Humility accepts that we are limited instruments who serve where God places us and entrust the rest to him. This is especially important in caring professions and apostolic work, where priests, teachers, doctors, nurses, counsellors, and parents whose vocation is continual service can easily become depleted if they think caring for themselves is selfish. Exhaustion eventually lowers the quality of that service: a person who never rests may grow irritable, one who carries every problem emotionally may lose perspective, and one who never sets any boundary may withdraw completely because he has nothing left to give. Responsible self-care protects the capacity to serve, though this is not the modern ideal of self-care that makes personal comfort the highest priority. Christian self-care is ordered toward vocation—we rest so that we can work and love well, care for our health so that we can meet our responsibilities, and cultivate interior peace so that we can be more available to God and others—so that its purpose is not self-enclosure but greater freedom for self-gift. Here again Christ provides the model, for the Gospels show him giving himself so tirelessly that he and the apostles sometimes had no time even to eat, and they also show him withdrawing to deserted places to pray and telling the apostles after a demanding stretch of ministry, “Come away by yourselves to a lonely place, and rest a while.” There is no contradiction in this, because rest belongs within the rhythm of service; a bow that is never unstrung loses its usefulness, and human beings likewise need rhythms of work and rest, activity and prayer, giving and receiving. To ignore these rhythms is not heroism but often simply imprudence.

Proper self-love also includes accepting ourselves, which can be hard for people who confuse humility with a negative self-image and suppose that thinking badly of themselves is somehow virtuous. But humility does not mean denying what is good in us. If God has given us intelligence, talent, generosity, or perseverance, acknowledging it is not pride, because pride claims gifts as though they came entirely from ourselves or uses them to establish superiority, whereas gratitude recognizes them as gifts; we can say truthfully that God has given us certain abilities and that we are responsible for using them well. In the same way we can acknowledge our limitations without self-contempt—perhaps we are not naturally outgoing, perhaps our health restricts what we can do, perhaps we carry wounds from the past—because reality has to be accepted before it can be transformed, and we cannot build a healthy life on the continual rejection of who we actually are. Proper self-acceptance says: this is the person God has given me to sanctify, not an imaginary person or the one I wish I were or the one others expect me to be, but this person, with these gifts and weaknesses, this history and these circumstances. From that starting point grace works. Self-acceptance does not mean complacency, since we may need to change a great deal—a quick temper disciplined, selfish habits corrected, wounds healed, skills developed, virtues grown—but genuine change begins from truth rather than from self-rejection, for we do not improve by hating ourselves into becoming someone else; we grow by accepting God’s love and cooperating with grace.

This distinction matters most when we deal with failure. A person with healthy self-love can admit, “I did something wrong,” while a person with a fragile sense of worth hears instead, “I am worthless,” and these are not the same judgment. Christian repentance concerns what we have done and what we have become through our choices, but it never denies our fundamental dignity, since even serious sin does not erase the fact that the sinner remains a person loved and sought by God. The parable of the Prodigal Son shows this beautifully: the younger son has acted badly, wasting his inheritance and damaging his relationship with his father, and he returns expecting to be treated merely as a hired servant, yet the father restores him as a son. He must repent and he must return, but he does not have to create his sonship through performance, because it is received. This is a powerful foundation for proper self-love, since we can confront our faults honestly precisely because our identity runs deeper than them, so that we can repent without self-hatred and begin again. Such security also makes self-sacrifice freer. If we are constantly seeking validation, our generosity becomes entangled with the need to be appreciated: we give but secretly need gratitude, we help but grow resentful when our help is taken for granted, we sacrifice but expect others to notice the cost. Proper self-love reduces this dependence, because when our deepest worth comes from God we no longer need every act of service to confirm our value; we can give more freely, sometimes serve without recognition, and also decline a request without feeling that our worth has shrunk. Freedom from an excessive need for approval is one of the fruits of a secure identity.

This does not mean growing indifferent to relationships, for human beings naturally need love, friendship, and belonging; we are relational creatures. But no human relationship can bear the weight of becoming the ultimate source of our identity, since that place belongs to God, and when we expect another person to make us feel permanently secure we lay an impossible burden on the relationship. Proper self-love therefore grows together with love of God, and the more deeply we know ourselves as loved by him, the less desperately we need to prove our worth, which in turn makes our relationships with others healthier: we can love them without clinging, serve without losing ourselves, receive love without making it an idol, and set boundaries without withdrawing into selfishness. The word “boundaries” can be used badly, and our culture sometimes treats any demand, inconvenience, or sacrifice as a violation of personal boundaries, which is incompatible with Christian discipleship, because love does make demands: family life requires sacrifice, friendship requires availability, and vocation imposes obligations we cannot abandon whenever they become uncomfortable. A Christian cannot use “self-care” as an excuse to avoid the Cross. Yet the opposite error is just as real, and we should not call every refusal selfish or every boundary uncharitable, since a boundary is legitimate when it protects a real good, preserves the right order of responsibilities, or prevents another person from acting unjustly or destructively. Prudence tells the difference.

This is why there is no simple formula for balancing self-love and sacrifice, for the same action may be generous in one circumstance and imprudent in another. Staying late to help someone may be an act of charity tonight and become irresponsible if we do it every night while neglecting our family; giving financial help may be generous in one situation and harmful if it continually finances another person’s destructive habits; listening patiently to someone in distress may be loving, while letting that person dominate every available hour indefinitely may be unhealthy for both. Love requires judgment, seeking the objective good of everyone involved, and that “everyone” includes ourselves. This can feel uncomfortable, because Christian spirituality rightly warns against selfishness, and we should keep that warning, since we naturally tend toward self-centeredness—rationalizing comfort, protecting our preferences, resisting sacrifice—and much of spiritual growth consists in learning to forget ourselves and make a sincere gift of self. Yet self-forgetfulness is not the same as self-erasure, and paradoxically it is healthy self-love that allows greater self-forgetfulness. A person secure in his dignity does not need to keep monitoring how others perceive him or defending his importance, and so he can turn his attention outward, whereas the insecure person may look self-sacrificing while remaining intensely preoccupied with whether others need, approve of, or appreciate him. Proper self-love frees us from this hidden self-focus. The goal is not to think constantly about loving ourselves but to become sufficiently grounded in the truth of our dignity that we are free to love, and this is what maturity looks like. The mature person knows himself and accepts reality; he understands his strengths and weaknesses, can receive criticism without collapsing, can say no without needless guilt and yes without resentment, can ask for help, can rest when rest is needed and work hard when duty requires it, and can sacrifice generously without turning himself into a victim, because his identity is stable enough to permit genuine self-gift and does not need to be indispensable or to measure its worth by how much it does for others.

This maturity is particularly important in close relationships, since marriage, family life, and friendship all require enormous generosity, yet healthy love never seeks the destruction of either person. Marriage calls spouses to give themselves deeply to one another, and yet neither spouse ceases to be a person with an individual relationship with God, a conscience, legitimate needs, and personal responsibility, for authentic unity does not erase individuality. The same holds between parents and children: parents sacrifice enormously for their children, especially when they are young, but good parenting gradually prepares those children to become responsible adults, and a parent who cannot let an adult child make decisions, feel consequences, or become independent may be confusing love with control. Adult children in turn have real duties toward aging parents, but these must be integrated prudently with their responsibilities toward spouse, children, work, and health, because love must always be ordered. St. Thomas Aquinas clarifies this through his teaching on the order of charity, which begins with God as the supreme good: we love ourselves in God because we are called to share in his happiness, and we love our neighbor because he too is created for communion with God, so that proper self-love and love of neighbor arise from the same source and are not competitors. Disordered self-love places the self above God and others, disordered self-neglect treats the self as though it had no God-given value, and charity avoids both errors by loving according to truth.

This also helps us understand Christ’s own self-sacrifice, which is not an act of self-hatred, for he freely lays down his life—”No one takes it from me,” he says, “but I lay it down of my own accord”—so that his sacrifice is free, purposeful, and directed toward redemption. This is the pattern of Christian sacrifice: we do not seek suffering for its own sake but accept it when love requires, and sometimes love may require heroic sacrifice, even the gift of life itself, as the martyrs show. Their willingness to die did not mean they despised life; precisely because life is a great good, offering it to God became the supreme sacrifice. Christianity therefore rejects both selfish self-preservation and meaningless self-destruction, and the question is always what love requires. Most of the time the answer lies not in dramatic sacrifice but in ordinary fidelity—getting up when we are tired, fulfilling our duties, listening when we would rather speak, forgiving, sharing our time, accepting interruptions, caring for those entrusted to us—and also, when it is right, sleeping when we need to, seeking medical help when ill, taking reasonable recreation, and recognizing when another person must carry his own responsibility. All of these can belong to charity.

Proper self-love also requires protecting our moral and spiritual life, and here we meet perhaps the clearest boundary of all: we should never sacrifice conscience in order to please another person, since no relationship, authority, or expectation can require us to do what is objectively wrong. People eager to please sometimes find this hard, fearing conflict or rejection, but love of neighbor can never require disobedience to God. In the same way we should protect the conditions our relationship with him depends on, for prayer is easily sacrificed to endless activity: we tell ourselves we are too busy serving others to pray, and yet without prayer our service gradually loses its source. Christ himself withdrew to pray despite the needs pressing around him, and if he did so, we should not imagine that constant activity is a higher form of generosity. Time with God is not selfish withdrawal but the restoring of the order of love, and prayer reminds us that we are first of all receivers, since before we give anything we receive our very existence, along with grace and love, from God. This is another reason proper self-love begins with being loved, because we cannot give indefinitely from an empty interior; the Christian life is not a heroic project of generating love entirely from within ourselves but a matter of receiving love from God and letting it flow through us. The Eucharist expresses this beautifully, for Christ gives himself to us so that we can become capable of giving ourselves—we receive before we offer, and grace precedes our response. This pattern corrects both errors at once: the selfish person wants only to receive, the compulsively self-sacrificing person tries only to give, and Christian life requires both, so that we receive gratefully and give generously, allowing ourselves to be loved so that we can love.

This means, too, learning to receive from other people. Some find giving far easier than receiving, comfortable being needed but uncomfortable needing anyone, ready to help others while resisting any help themselves, and though this can look generous it may conceal pride or a fear of vulnerability. Human community depends on mutual dependence, and letting another person help us can itself be an act of humility and love, since it gives him the chance to give. We should not imagine that maturity means complete self-sufficiency, for no one is self-sufficient; we need God and we need others, and proper self-love accepts this dependence without shame. It also accepts that life has seasons in which we give more and seasons in which we must receive more, since illness, grief, old age, or crisis may for a time reduce our capacity to serve and leave us dependent on others. This can be painful for someone used to being useful, and yet our worth does not disappear when our productivity declines: a person who can no longer work remains infinitely valuable, and a person who needs care is not less worthy than the one who gives it, because Christian dignity does not rest on usefulness. This is especially important in a culture that so often measures people by productivity, a measure proper self-love resists, since we are human beings before we are workers, achievers, or providers, and our value rests in who we are before God. That truth gives deep peace as our abilities change, for youth, health, success, and independence are all temporary, and if our identity depends on them, then aging and limitation become existential threats, whereas if our identity rests in God we can receive each stage of life more freely—still grieving real losses, but without losing ourselves.

The proper love of self therefore prepares us both to give and to receive, teaching us to care for ourselves without becoming self-centered, to sacrifice without destroying ourselves, to accept help without feeling worthless, and to set boundaries without becoming hard-hearted—and above all that love must be ordered by truth. The great commandment is one unified call: to love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love our neighbor as ourselves. These loves belong together, with love of God giving direction to everything else, proper self-love receiving our own life as a gift from him, and love of neighbor turning that gift outward in service. When the order is right, self-love does not compete with generosity but makes it possible, since we care for the instrument so that it can be used, accept the person so that the person can be given, and receive love so that love can be shared. There will always be tension in practice—we will sometimes be tempted toward selfishness and at other times overextend ourselves, saying yes when we should have said no or refusing when generosity asked for more—but prudence grows through experience as we learn, adjust, seek advice, and examine our motives. The most useful question is not simply “What do I want?” or “What does the other person want?” but “What does love truly require here?” Sometimes the answer will cost us greatly, sometimes it will ask for rest, sometimes for giving and sometimes for receiving, sometimes for speaking and sometimes for silence, sometimes for staying and sometimes for stepping back. Christian love cannot be reduced to a single rule of always putting ourselves last, because it is more demanding than that: it asks for discernment. We are called to make a sincere gift of ourselves, but a gift must first exist in order to be given, and God has entrusted each of us with a person—ourselves—to know, accept, form, care for, and finally offer back to him. Proper self-love means taking that stewardship seriously. We neither idolize ourselves nor despise ourselves; we receive ourselves, and then, secure in the knowledge that we are created and loved by God, we become ever more free to forget ourselves in love.

This is the paradox at the heart of Christian self-gift: we find ourselves not by anxiously protecting ourselves but by giving ourselves away, and yet the self we give is not worthless but precious precisely because it belongs to God. The more deeply we understand this, the more generous our sacrifice can become, because we no longer serve in order to prove our worth but because our worth has already been given. We no longer cling to ourselves in fear, and neither do we erase ourselves in the name of generosity; we place ourselves freely in God’s hands. Then self-love and self-sacrifice find their proper unity. We love ourselves as God loves us, and because he loves us, we are free to give ourselves away.

 

By the Via Virtutis team
Photo by Paul Pastourmatzis on Unsplash

Related Posts

Meaningful, world-saving action does not require a person to have always aspired toward heroism, but can instead emerge from an ordinary person's willingness to accept an unwanted but genuinely necessary responsibility.
Genuine heroism often does not announce itself in advance, but emerges instead from people simply continuing to fulfill their ordinary responsibilities with extraordinary seriousness once circumstances suddenly demand far more of them.
Human capacity for survival and resolve under pressure often exceeds what a person's ordinary, unremarkable daily life might suggest they are capable of.